Rights vs Responsibilities
Hoefstede identified several axes on which cultures differ. One of them relates to whether people in a culture tend to think more about rights or responsibilities. In the US we talk a lot about people’s rights, and relatively little about people’s responsibilities. Civil rights. Bill of rights. Right to life. etc. Europeans tend to swing towards the other side of that spectrum. For example, a sense of responsibility for impact on future generations tends to leads to valuing environmental issues more greatly.
The communist party line in China is also very concerned with responsibilities, but in a somewhat different way. When a Chinese person gets put in jail for speaking out against the government, Americans cry human rights abuses. The Chinese might respond by saying that the stability of the government is more important for the entire population than the welfare of any individual. The jailed person was not fulfilling their responsibility to the rest of the population. A little twisted, a little tautological, but an interesting perspective nonetheless.
Individuals also vary along this same spectrum. Some people are much more duty-driven than others. I’m thinking of Frederick, the "slave of duty" in The Pirates of Penzance, probably because of the fabulous performance I just saw. But I digress. Other people have very little regard for how their actions affect others, and are consumed with themselves.
Over the decades, I have swung back and forth on this spectrum without realizing it. Now that I understand what’s going on a bit more, I am consciously choosing to think about the world more in terms of responsibilities — my responsibilities to my friends, my family, my community and to the world at large. I also have a responsibility to myself, but I try to consider it in balance with the other responsibilities I have.
This is not to say that I support human rights abuses in China. But I do think that American collective psychology is fairly conceited, and greedy in a short-sited kind of way. I should really gather all that paperwork together and turn in my application for an EU passport. Not that I think I could ever really escape from my fabulous community here in Seattle, but it never hurts to have options.
Leo is a professional geek who looks forward to the robots taking over. For more current, less coherent thoughts, follow him on twitter
Hi here!
Oh, how I hear you… After some years (5) studying management I found – all what management about is balancing control and responsibilities. If employee has a great decision-making power and no responsibilities,or on contrary a very little control and great responsibilities the organization will crash. So, rights must be balanced out by responsibilities… else we will be in the shaking mode.. and I think that is what our world is today. As a human being I have a choice (I hope it’s clear without quoting classics ‘to be or not to be…’) – what should I do with it? Does it affect my rights and my responsibilities? Consitution outlines my rights and responsibilities for my country, but how about personal life… I see how modern world is becoming more and more legalistic, i.e. relying on the law and, I think it is because we are failing in dealing with the world without boudaries, yes, the one we are all dreaming about (sorry for quoting another classic: ‘..and no religions too…’). Boundaries are disappearing, but problems only growing… including the one you’ve described. How to draw the line between right and wrong? How to live together without stepping over someone’s rights, or responsibilities? Yet, we believe there will be a wonderful law that will set us all on the same page… And usually we try to live out a principle of high moral standards that we sometimes comply, but want everyone else comply at all times – it is called self-righteousness… So,it ends up here, in your heart – and there is no escape…
"Over the decades, I have swung back and forth on this spectrum without realizing it. Now that I understand what's going on a bit more, I am consciously choosing to think about the world more in terms of responsibilities — my responsibilities to my friends, my family, my community and to the world at large. I also have a responsibility to myself, but I try to consider it in balance with the other responsibilities I have."
No kidding. I understand too what you say about coming to an understanding after that "the passage of time" experience scenario thingee. A silly summary of that learning curve might be: Freedom of speech does not mean getting your jollies by screaming "Fire!" in a crowded venue.
For all of its initially-seeming kookiness, I venture to suggest http://www.zetatalk.com (The Zetas? Really? Whoah!!) have got it all figured out with the division between Service-to-Self and Service-to-Others entities. This website goes deep into deep things but keeps it all, and remarkably so, in the realm of "reality" — very surreal, that.
"In the US we talk a lot about people's rights, and relatively little about people's responsibilities. Civil rights. Bill of rights. Right to life. etc."
"Pain And Conscience" by Charles Sullivan sez it quite succinctly. Check it out:
http://chaoschasm2.blogspot.com/2008/06/network.html