<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Tough Engineering Decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.embracingchaos.com/2007/05/a_tough_enginee.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.embracingchaos.com/2007/05/a_tough_enginee.html</link>
	<description>Analysis of Trends in Technology, Business, Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: leodirac</title>
		<link>http://www.embracingchaos.com/2007/05/a_tough_enginee.html/comment-page-1#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>leodirac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 19:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.embracingchaos.com/2007/05/a_tough_enginee.html#comment-357</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yep.  Based on just what&#039;s shared here I probably would have held off.  But my experience with the whole system gave me enough confidence that it would work out that I thought it worth the risk.  I knew the CDN&#039;s cache efficiency hadn&#039;t been super high, and I had faith in the robustness of the database I knew we&#039;d be pummeling hardest, especially since we&#039;d tuned the connection and thread pools to that one to keep the system from swamping itself under heavy load.  Like I say it&#039;s a judgment call.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  Based on just what&#39;s shared here I probably would have held off.  But my experience with the whole system gave me enough confidence that it would work out that I thought it worth the risk.  I knew the CDN&#39;s cache efficiency hadn&#39;t been super high, and I had faith in the robustness of the database I knew we&#39;d be pummeling hardest, especially since we&#39;d tuned the connection and thread pools to that one to keep the system from swamping itself under heavy load.  Like I say it&#39;s a judgment call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramez Naam</title>
		<link>http://www.embracingchaos.com/2007/05/a_tough_enginee.html/comment-page-1#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramez Naam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.embracingchaos.com/2007/05/a_tough_enginee.html#comment-356</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great story.  I think I would have not pressed the button, on the grounds of choosing the devil I knew over the one I didn&#039;t (the potential takedown of the whole site).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Glad it worked out!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story.  I think I would have not pressed the button, on the grounds of choosing the devil I knew over the one I didn&#39;t (the potential takedown of the whole site).</p>
<p>Glad it worked out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

