<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mergers: When they can work and why they usually don&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.embracingchaos.com/2007/10/mergers-when-th.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.embracingchaos.com/2007/10/mergers-when-th.html</link>
	<description>Analysis of Trends in Technology, Business, Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Embracing Chaos &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Microhoo! deal is all about network effects - Leo Parker Dirac on Business and Technology Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.embracingchaos.com/2007/10/mergers-when-th.html/comment-page-1#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Embracing Chaos &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Microhoo! deal is all about network effects - Leo Parker Dirac on Business and Technology Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.embracingchaos.com/2007/10/mergers-when-th.html#comment-655</guid>
		<description>[...] most corporate mergers fail (often due to mis-aligned incentives on the part of the deal-makers) there is a solid economic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most corporate mergers fail (often due to mis-aligned incentives on the part of the deal-makers) there is a solid economic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Embracing Chaos &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft buys tiny stake in Facebook: Game on! - Leo Parker Dirac on Business and Technology Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.embracingchaos.com/2007/10/mergers-when-th.html/comment-page-1#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Embracing Chaos &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft buys tiny stake in Facebook: Game on! - Leo Parker Dirac on Business and Technology Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.embracingchaos.com/2007/10/mergers-when-th.html#comment-648</guid>
		<description>[...] After months of rumors about companies trying to buy Facebook, yesterday a deal was announced.&#160; In a sense the deal is quite small because Facebook sold just a 1.6% equity stake to Microsoft.&#160; But by paying $240 million, the deal values Facebook at about $15 billion!&#160; What&#8217;s going on here?&#160; This surely can&#8217;t be based on rational economics, can it?&#160; Let&#8217;s analyze how these deals should be valued and take a few steps back through recent internet acquisition history for context. In trying to keep this post focused, I wrote a separate article about why mergers and acquisitions rarely work. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After months of rumors about companies trying to buy Facebook, yesterday a deal was announced.&nbsp; In a sense the deal is quite small because Facebook sold just a 1.6% equity stake to Microsoft.&nbsp; But by paying $240 million, the deal values Facebook at about $15 billion!&nbsp; What&#8217;s going on here?&nbsp; This surely can&#8217;t be based on rational economics, can it?&nbsp; Let&#8217;s analyze how these deals should be valued and take a few steps back through recent internet acquisition history for context. In trying to keep this post focused, I wrote a separate article about why mergers and acquisitions rarely work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

